Success story · Sercom

A bot that tops the ranking of a retail portfolio.

Sercom added Saldia to a retail card portfolio, across both early- and late-stage buckets. In two weeks the agent closed 295 payment promises for $49.5M: first across the whole portfolio, ahead of every human collector.

Collections agency +10 years in the market Retail card portfolio Co-designed the solution

Who they are

An agency with craft, not a textbook early adopter.

Sercom is a collections agency with more than ten years in the market. They didn't come to Saldia looking for new technology: they came with a volume problem and the operational judgment to tell whether the tool was any good.

That experience ended up shaping the product. Sercom helped design the solution and was the first case in production: the negotiating policy, the delinquency buckets and the hand-off criteria came out of how a real operation works, not out of a hypothesis of ours.

The challenge

Many accounts, small balances, short window.

The portfolio is retail card (anonymized) and covers two buckets: early- and late-stage delinquency. It's the kind of portfolio where human collections gets expensive — many low-balance accounts, where each contact costs the same as on a large account but recovers far less.

01

High volume

Many accounts per collector, with little time for each conversation.

02

Small balances

The cost per contact doesn't drop, but the amount to recover does.

03

Limited hours

Human collections ends when the shift ends; the debtor answers when they can.

What they deployed

Saldia. across both delinquency buckets.

The agent negotiates over voice, chat and WhatsApp 24 hours a day, on 30 dedicated channels. It proposes plans within the portfolio's policy, closes the payment promise and logs it — and hands off to a human collector when the case calls for it.

Voice, chat and WhatsApp

The same agent on all three channels, with the same policy.

24 hours

No gaps for shifts or weekends.

Early and late

Covers both buckets of the portfolio, with different rules in each.

Results

Two weeks, first place.

Pilot from September 1st to 14th. The numbers compare Saldia against the contact center's average collector, on the same portfolio.

295

bot payment promises

#1 by count across the whole portfolio.

$49.5M

in promises

#1 by amount across the whole portfolio.

4.6×

more promises

295 vs. 64 for the average collector.

3.2×

more value

$49.5M vs. $15.7M for the average collector.

The full portfolio ranking

Amount promised per collector · collectors anonymized.

Saldia · bot

$49.5M · 295

Collector

$22.5M · 82

Collector

$20.1M · 82

Collector

$18.5M · 72

Collector

$18.1M · 65

How to read these numbers. The bot's average ticket is $167,734 per promise, lower than a collector's. That isn't a weakness: the bot works the smaller-balance buckets, precisely the ones a human operation gets the least out of. It wins on volume, which is exactly what it was put there to do.

What the case shows

It doesn't replace the team: it takes off their plate what doesn't pay.

The bot didn't top the ranking because it negotiates better than a good collector. It topped it because it works 24 hours, doesn't tire out on account number two hundred, and takes without complaint the part of the portfolio that eats a human's day to recover very little.

That leaves collectors where they do make a difference: the large accounts, the cases with a complaint, the situations that call for judgment. Same team, workload split a different way.

Let's talk

Want to see these numbers on your own portfolio?

A 30-minute conversation is enough to see whether your operation has a similar case.

Book a call